Perceptions on DICOM MWL, MPPS, MWM and RIS in Healthcare Information Systems
In the world of healthcare information technology, the challenge is to create systems that can seamlessly integrate various medical processes for improved efficiency. Terms like RIS (Radiology Information System) and DICOM MWL (Modality Worklist) are frequently discussed — not just because of their functionality, but also because of differing interpretations that influence implementation and workflow in healthcare facility. While some view RIS as a complex system that connects the entire radiology workflow, others believe that a simple patient list is sufficient to qualify as RIS. These differences are not merely terminological, but reflect how these systems are practically applied in day-to-day healthcare settings.
One critical aspect of medical imaging technology is the understanding of DICOM MWL, which is often seen as a cornerstone in improving operational efficiency. However, debates arise, particularly when other terms are used in a similar context, such as MPPS (Modality Performed Procedure Step) or DICOM MWM (Modality Worklist Management). Each of these terms has specific meanings and roles within the healthcare ecosystem, which continues to evolve over time.
Artikel dalam bahasa indonesia tersedia disini!
What is RIS, and How Simple Can It Be to Be Called RIS?
In practice, the scope of what qualifies as RIS can vary widely. In smaller clinics, a simple patient list stored digitally or even on paper might be referred to as RIS, as it fulfills the basic need for patient management. However, for others, a true RIS is expected to act as the central nervous system of the radiology department — connecting scheduling, patient records, imaging data, and results in one seamless and integrated workflow.
In a real-world scenario, a large hospital with high patient volumes often relies on an integrated RIS system with DICOM MWL to optimize workflows. Imagine a scenario where a large hospital has to manually enter patient data into imaging devices every time examination is performed. This process significantly slows down the workflow and increases the potential for human error. In this context, RIS that isn’t integrated with technologies like DICOM MWL can be a major bottleneck to operational efficiency.
The Role of DICOM MWL and MPPS in Clinical Workflow
DICOM MWL was designed to address this issue. With DICOM MWL, modality devices like CT, MRI, or ultrasound can automatically pull patient data from the hospital’s information system without manual entry. This reduces data input errors, saves time, and boosts operational efficiency in the radiology department.
However, MPPS plays an important role in more complex medical workflows. For instance, MPPS records procedural steps for imaging devices, like start and end times and the number of images produced. MPPS integration ensures more complete and accurate documentation, enhancing transparency and accountability in healthcare services.
DICOM MWM: Different Terminology
DICOM MWM is often seen as a variant of DICOM MWL. Despite the different terminology, both serve the same purpose: simplifying patient data management and accelerating the radiology workflow. MWM, or Modality Worklist Management, functions similarly to MWL by sending patient data directly to imaging devices. The difference lies only in the terminology used in various systems, which ultimately does not affect the core functionality of the system.
DICOM Tag: A Solution Without MPPS
While MPPS is considered an essential element for ensuring complete data in radiology systems, in reality, even without MPPS, data can still be recorded using DICOM tags. These tags store essential information about imaging procedures, such as patient data, exam type, and procedure status. By using the correct DICOM tags, even without MPPS, the necessary data for analysis and medical decisions can still be accessed and used. This shows that while MPPS makes automatic logging easier, systems without it can still function effectively using DICOM tags.
Conclusion
Differences in the interpretation of terms like RIS, DICOM MWL, MPPS, and others often arise due to varying experiences and needs of healthcare facilities. There is no single correct or incorrect definition — the most important thing is how these systems support efficiency, quality, and better patient outcomes. As time progresses, understanding of these technologies will continue to evolve alongside advancements in healthcare and information technology.
Ultimately, each healthcare facility must choose a system that best suits its needs, whether it’s a simple RIS that only tracks a patient list or a more sophisticated RIS integrated with DICOM MWL and MPPS to maximize workflow efficiency.
Thank you for reading until the end. What do you think of this article? Please share your feedback in the comments below.
